Research Profiles
Heritage in hospitals
Principle Investigators: Dr Helen Chatterjee (Deputy Director, UCL Museums
& Collections) and Guy Noble (Arts Curator UCLH Arts)
Research Associates: Dr Linda Thomson and Erica Ander (UCL Museums & Collections)



Photography Robert Little |
|
Researchers and curators from University College London (UCL) and
University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Arts have established
a unique programme called 'Heritage in Hospitals' funded by the
AHRC (Award No: AH/G000506/1). The main aim of this research is
to evaluate the impact of museum object handling on the wellbeing
of patients in a variety of healthcare settings. Objects used for
handling comprise archaeological artefacts, artworks, and geology
and natural history specimens from UCL Museums & Collections. Handling
sessions consist of one-to-one, bedside sessions in the hospital
where participants are invited to discuss and explore an array of
six museum objects (top image). Participants comprise patients from
UCH wards for acute and elderly care, gynaecology and oncology,
the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN) Albany
Ward for rehabilitation, and the Oxford Enablement Unit (OEU). The
project uses a standard NHS consent form and a Patient Information
Leaflet (MREC No: 06/Q0505/78).
To evaluate the impact of the handling sessions, measures are taken
pre-session to provide baseline data and post-session for comparison
consequently participants act as their own controls. Measures consist
of the Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) mood adjective
list (Watson, Clark and Tellegen, 1988) and two Visual Analogue
Scales (VAS) for wellbeing and happiness (EuroQol Group, 1990).
Comparison of pre- and post-session PANAS measures show a highly
significant increase in positive mood and decrease in negative mood.
Improvements in mood are slightly more marked in female than male
participants. There are also highly significant increases in the
direct measures of wellbeing and happiness and these correlate with
measures of positive mood. There are no significant effects of facilitator
or object selection.
The research aims to link these positive outcomes with wellbeing.
It is likely that as a result of engagement with the museum objects,
patients are distracted from their clinical surroundings and feel
healthier and happier. Findings from the quantitative analysis correspond
with participants' comments, for example, prior to the handling
session some patients reported feeling quite nervous or anxious
while waiting for clinical procedures but after the session reported
the activity had taken their mind off the medical treatment. Further
studies need to be carried out to explore the impact of museum object
handling on a greater variety of patients as well as their carers
and staff. Findings from the current study will contribute to a
best practice guide for museum and care worker training.
|